差錯許多人做當參與製造商或買的產品中國是認為粗劣時。 最低的最費用低的價格，折扣折扣折扣。 有貿易商當前不利用的一好選擇和一個。

例如讓作為每鞋。 差不多50%所有鞋子在英國賣了發起於中國。 現在費用在製造介入了一雙鞋包括材料的費用， ie。 皮革，包裝的費用，費用…

讀其餘「便宜或增值」或張貼評論 >>

根據 金融時報, 當我們決定是製作者、實行家和幫手，我們全部選擇了錯誤事業。 大金錢在運動的金錢，并且最佳的薪金成交在中國現在被給交易者。

地方中國和國際金融服務公司受益於市場的最近開頭。 外國公司到達了在一一味尋歡作樂，当現金的巨大的容量攪動在不報答的銀行帳戶或者說謊在床墊下。 它是供給和需求完善的會議。

讀其餘「技能競爭在中國財務」或張貼評論 >>

Collective labour contracts have been developed and promoted by the Chinese government and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) since the mid-1990s. Thus far, however, because of the lack of genuine worker participation in the contract negotiations, they have brought only limited benefit to China’s workers.

Read the rest of “Breaking the Impasse” or post a comment >>

By Dan Harris

My friend Chris Carr, dean of the CalPoly MBA program and the brains behind the International Business Tour blog has a very thoughtful post, entitled, “Will Paying More Change Behavior And Make Someone More Ethical?” Thoughtful, but wrong.

The post centers on whether paying more gets you better performance and/or better ethics, and Chris pretty much says it does not:

“Some suggested that we could solve the problem of too many defective products coming from China by paying more to the Chinese suppliers that make this stuff. I questioned that assumption, and still do.

One example I gave in that discussion thread was that if paying people more solved the problem, then why does paying most good employees more still result in good performance, but not superior performance? (See Comment No. 29.) And why does paying most bad employees more money still get you bad performance, and not good performance? (If you feel that more money correlates to higher performance, come see me after you have hired, managed and fired more than a few people, and let’s compare notes.)”

Read the rest of “Why Paying More Is Good China Business” or post a comment

By Alexander de Neree

Besides the human tragedy, there has always been a certain irony in the fact that the communist system has never been able to achieve its main goal: to bring prosperity to the masses.

More specifically in China, there first where the farmers that did not particularly benefited from the revolution that was undertaken in their name. And now, much to Beijing’s chagrin one imagines, one scandal after another regarding the maltreatment of workers hits the international press circuit.

But, help is underway. Starting January 1, 2008, the new labour contract law will come in force in China. Surprisingly it has many characteristics of the Dutch system which will give rise to some alarm among employers familiar with the Dutch system. Read the rest of “Workers’ paradise” or post a comment