間違いは多くの人々中国で製造業者か購入プロダクト従事させることが安く考えることいつであるか作る。 最も低く最も費用低い価格、割引割引割引。 貿易業者が現在開発していない1および大いによりよい代わりある。

例えば靴取得を許可する。 all the靴のほぼ50%は中国にイギリスで起きる販売した。 今度は費用は含まれている材料の費用、ieが含んだ靴の製造で。 革、包装の費用、費用の…

「安いですか付加価値」の残りを読むか、またはコメントを掲示しなさい >>

に従って ファイナンシャル・タイムズ, 私達はすべて私達がメーカー、実行家および助手であることにしたときに間違ったキャリアを選んだ。 大きいお金は移動お金にあり、中国の最もよいサラリーの取り引きは仕切り人に今与えられている。

ローカル中国および国際的な金融サービスの会社は市場の最近の開始から寄与した。 外国会社はunrewarding銀行口座でぼちゃぼちゃとかき回すか、またはマットレスの下にあっていて現金の巨大な容積がよい時に、着いた。 それは完全な需要と供給の合致である。

「中国財政の技術競争」のの残りを読むか、またはコメントを掲示しなさい >>

Collective labour contracts have been developed and promoted by the Chinese government and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) since the mid-1990s. Thus far, however, because of the lack of genuine worker participation in the contract negotiations, they have brought only limited benefit to China’s workers.

Read the rest of “Breaking the Impasse” or post a comment >>

By Dan Harris

My friend Chris Carr, dean of the CalPoly MBA program and the brains behind the International Business Tour blog has a very thoughtful post, entitled, “Will Paying More Change Behavior And Make Someone More Ethical?” Thoughtful, but wrong.

The post centers on whether paying more gets you better performance and/or better ethics, and Chris pretty much says it does not:

“Some suggested that we could solve the problem of too many defective products coming from China by paying more to the Chinese suppliers that make this stuff. I questioned that assumption, and still do.

One example I gave in that discussion thread was that if paying people more solved the problem, then why does paying most good employees more still result in good performance, but not superior performance? (See Comment No. 29.) And why does paying most bad employees more money still get you bad performance, and not good performance? (If you feel that more money correlates to higher performance, come see me after you have hired, managed and fired more than a few people, and let’s compare notes.)”

Read the rest of “Why Paying More Is Good China Business” or post a comment

By Alexander de Neree

Besides the human tragedy, there has always been a certain irony in the fact that the communist system has never been able to achieve its main goal: to bring prosperity to the masses.

More specifically in China, there first where the farmers that did not particularly benefited from the revolution that was undertaken in their name. And now, much to Beijing’s chagrin one imagines, one scandal after another regarding the maltreatment of workers hits the international press circuit.

But, help is underway. Starting January 1, 2008, the new labour contract law will come in force in China. Surprisingly it has many characteristics of the Dutch system which will give rise to some alarm among employers familiar with the Dutch system. Read the rest of “Workers’ paradise” or post a comment