Der Fehler viele Leute bilden, wann, Hersteller oder kaufende Produkte in China sich zu engagieren, billig zu denken ist. Niedrigster Kosten-niedrigster Preis, Diskontdiskontdiskont. Es gibt eine viel bessere Alternative und, die Händler nicht z.Z. ausnutzen.

Läßt z.B. Nehmen ein Paar Schuhe. Fast 50% aller Schuhe verkaufte in Großbritannien entstehen in China. Jetzt bezogen die Kosten mit ein, wenn sie ein Paar Schuhe herstellten, einschließen die Kosten der Materialien, IE. Leder, die Kosten des Verpackens, die Kosten von…

Lesen Sie den Rest „von preiswertem oder von Dienstleistungs“ oder geben Sie eine Anmerkung bekannt >>

Entsprechend Finanzielle Zeiten, alle wir wählten die falsche Karriere, als wir entschieden, Hersteller, Handelnde und Helfer zu sein. Das grosse Geld ist in bewegendem Geld herum, und die besten Gehalt Abkommen in China werden zu den Abkommenherstellern im Augenblick gegeben.

Lokale chinesische und internationale Firmen der finanziellen Services haben von der neuen öffnung des Marktes profitiert. Die Auslandsgesellschaften sind zu einer guten Zeit gekommen, wenn die sehr großen Volumen Bargeld herum sloshing in den unrewarding Bankkonten oder unter Matratzen liegen. Es ist die vollkommene Sitzung des Angebotes und der Nachfrage.

Lesen Sie den Rest „der Fähigkeiten Konkurrenz in der China Finanzierung“ oder geben Sie eine Anmerkung bekannt >>

Collective labour contracts have been developed and promoted by the Chinese government and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) since the mid-1990s. Thus far, however, because of the lack of genuine worker participation in the contract negotiations, they have brought only limited benefit to China’s workers.

Read the rest of “Breaking the Impasse” or post a comment >>

By Dan Harris

My friend Chris Carr, dean of the CalPoly MBA program and the brains behind the International Business Tour blog has a very thoughtful post, entitled, “Will Paying More Change Behavior And Make Someone More Ethical?” Thoughtful, but wrong.

The post centers on whether paying more gets you better performance and/or better ethics, and Chris pretty much says it does not:

“Some suggested that we could solve the problem of too many defective products coming from China by paying more to the Chinese suppliers that make this stuff. I questioned that assumption, and still do.

One example I gave in that discussion thread was that if paying people more solved the problem, then why does paying most good employees more still result in good performance, but not superior performance? (See Comment No. 29.) And why does paying most bad employees more money still get you bad performance, and not good performance? (If you feel that more money correlates to higher performance, come see me after you have hired, managed and fired more than a few people, and let’s compare notes.)”

Read the rest of “Why Paying More Is Good China Business” or post a comment

By Alexander de Neree

Besides the human tragedy, there has always been a certain irony in the fact that the communist system has never been able to achieve its main goal: to bring prosperity to the masses.

More specifically in China, there first where the farmers that did not particularly benefited from the revolution that was undertaken in their name. And now, much to Beijing’s chagrin one imagines, one scandal after another regarding the maltreatment of workers hits the international press circuit.

But, help is underway. Starting January 1, 2008, the new labour contract law will come in force in China. Surprisingly it has many characteristics of the Dutch system which will give rise to some alarm among employers familiar with the Dutch system. Read the rest of “Workers’ paradise” or post a comment