由丹・哈里斯
安排一個非常周道的崗位，給權我的朋友克里斯Carr， CalPoly工商管理碩士節目和腦子的教務長在國際企業遊覽blog之後， 「將支付更多變動行為和使某人更加道德？」周道，但錯誤。
崗位集中支付更多是否得到您更好的表現和更好的概念，并且克里斯幾乎說它不：
「一些建議我們可能解決來自中國的許多次品的問題通過支付更多到做這種材料的中國供應商。 我對那個假定表示懷疑和仍然。
一例子i屈服了討論螺紋是，如果支付人更解決了問題，然後為什麼仍然支付多數好雇員結果在好表現，但不優越表現？ (參見評論沒有。 29.) 并且為什麼支付多數壞雇員更多金錢仍然得到您壞表現和不好表現？ (如果您認為更多金錢與更高的性能關聯，來看見我，在您聘用了，處理和射擊更多比之後幾人，和我們比較筆記。)」
由Dylan ・ Blankenship
“Private label products or services are typically those manufactured or provided by one company for offer under another company’s brand.” –Wikipedia. This is the name of the game for China and for the most part, the products you buy here in the United States are not really manufactured by the name on the label. In some instances most of the big box or clothing stores you frequent have an inventory almost entirely made up of their own products under their own brand or multiple unaffiliated brands. This is not just a game for the big boys, this can be accomplished with the same everyday products under your own company’s label. Welcome to the club, we are about to pull back the curtain to reveal what you need to know in developing your own private labeled line of products.
Take notice that every manufacturer has its own guidelines, requirements and procedures for producing a private label product. Not all manufacturers offer this service or have the capability to laser-etch/carve logos etc. The first step is to source the product you like and then follow-up with the manufacturer opening a dialog about private label opportunities.
In the aftermath of the recent recalls of tainted and toxic China-made products, more than a few have speculated that manufacturers who have outsourced production operations there are no doubt rethinking their sourcing strategies and quality control processes, and, if some of the, shall we say, ‘more aggressive’ pundits are to be believed, even rethinking their continued presence there altogether. However, according to the results of a proprietary survey just completed by the smart cube, the pundits appear to be very much mistaken.
Read the rest of “Survey: Global Manufacturers Staying Put in China” or post a comment >>
By Omer Abdullah
In the aftermath of the recent recalls of tainted and toxic China-made products, more than a few have speculated that manufacturers who have outsourced production operations there are no doubt rethinking their sourcing strategies and quality control processes, and, if some of the, shall we say, ‘more aggressive’ pundits are to be believed, even rethinking their continued presence there altogether. However, according to the results of a proprietary survey just completed by the smart cube, the pundits appear to be very much mistaken.
In fact, the majority of manufacturers surveyed are confident their supply chains are more than adequately secure to ensure the safety of their products. Indeed, nearly 80% of respondents (all of whom were manufacturers who currently manufactured their products in China) reported that they felt no need to review their supply chain activities in the wake of the well-publicized toy and toothpaste recalls. Further, these global manufacturers believe that the recent recall issues, while serious, are aberrations and not symptomatic of some more fundamental issue inherent within Chinese manufacturing. They appear to be on solid ground, as Mattel itself has apologized for initially putting the blame on its Chinese suppliers.
Read the rest of “Survey: Global Manufacturers Staying Put in China” or post a comment
Sourcing to China can be cost effective, but if something goes wrong, it could have a dramatic effect on your bottom line — and negatively impact customer opinion of your business. Can we trust domestic producers and distributors to control quality with fervor equal to their pursuit of low wages? Cheap labor is the easy part; the quality thing is a much tougher nut to crack.
Read the rest of “Is Sourcing in China Safe?” or post a comment >>
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |
