对雇用法律的指南在中国- 2008年(第I部分)
i. 雇用法律立法
1. 什么立法治理雇用法律在中国？
雇用法律在中国由在2007年末期治理，最近补充的法律相对地全套加强工作者’权利。
主要法律包括：
- 中华人民共和国的劳工法 (1994) (“劳工法”)
保护对 执行： 在哪里开始您的中国IPR战略？ 第II部分
要坚持专有权对IP，组织必须到位有机制保证持续的保护。
首先，某人必须保证登记的IP权利维护他们的有效性。 商标每次登记10年，因而注册应该是延长的在这样有效性期间之前结尾。 疏忽如此做导致所有专有权损失到商标…
保护对 Enforcement: Where to start your China IPR Strategy? Part I
The continued pervasiveness of counterfeiting in China is not only a problem of law, but also one of enforcement. While China’s laws and regulations conform to the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS) and other widely accepted international principles, certain parts of China’s protection mechanism have proven ineffective. Common examples are the high standards for criminal liability of counterfeiters, the high burden of evidence to prove bad faith registrations, and the difficulty to prove damages in civil proceedings…
Breaking the Impasse: Promoting Worker Involvement in the Collective Bargaining and Contracts Process
By Han Dongfang
Collective labour contracts have been developed and promoted by the Chinese government and the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) since the mid-1990s. Thus far, however, because of the lack of genuine worker participation in the contract negotiations, they have brought only limited benefit to China’s workers.
CLB believes free collective bargaining should be introduced into the collective contracts negotiating process as a means of not only protecting workers’ rights and interests but of also improving labour-management relations. Given the widespread abuse of workers’ rights and the often severe tensions that exist between labour and management in China today, there is now an increasingly urgent need to promote greater worker involvement in this process. Read the rest of “Breaking the Impasse: Promoting Worker Involvement in the Collective Bargaining and Contracts Process” or post a comment
Lying
A drawback of my, in itself interesting profession, is that I encounter a lot of lying in my daily work. Contrary to popular believe it is not so much the lawyers that do the lying. Although I have to admit lawyers are generally not easily persuaded to part with information, let alone the truth, I prefer to think of what we do as skilful editing of the information to fit a certain version of the truth. No harm in that. That is what lawyers are paid to do.
But in order to edit the information, you will have to obtain the information first. And that is not as easy as it may sound. First there is the filter of the client’s…
