Bargaining More Clearly, Starting with an Old Book
By Matt Young
These days, the China price that is not seriously negotiated is too high. In fact, if you’re not fiercely negotiating, you might as well buy from American vendors.
Case in point: I wasn’t in my right mind yesterday when I paid 25 yuan (US$3.67) for a paperback first published in 1955 by John F. Kennedy. That’s highway robbery considering I bought it not on Amazon.com, but from a street peddler selling it illegally in Beijing.
Used copies of this book on Amazon, by the way, go for a cent and a new one is worth US$4.90.
Does 25 percent off the value of a new copy sound like a good China price to you?
No, I got ripped off because I didn’t negotiate.
But think about it, even when you bargain, how confident are you that you got the best price possible? In China, I rarely am.
The DK Essential Managers series has an excellent, quick read (72 pages) on negotiating skills.
The best tip is to be clear about what you want, and this can be surprisingly difficult.
Say, for instance, that deep down, the most important thing was that I pay 10 yuan for the Kennedy book. Really, it was, as that’s what it costs me for a new DVD in Beijing, so why should an old paperback be more?
Well, even if I had bargained the price down to 15 yuan, I still wouldn’t have been happy because I didn’t reach my target price.
If, however, I convinced the vendor to sell me ten books for a total of 100 yuan, I would have been happy, because I would have achieved my target price. Yes, I would have had to pay more overall, but I would have gotten the Kennedy book for 10 yuan (my target), and a lot of other good books for the same price.
This is a simplistic way to understand the importance of clarity in a negotiation. But there’s an even better way:
1. Make a list of your objectives. Ideally, before buying books the other day, I would have listed: price, quality and quantity. Notice that I would have already become better aware of various ways to bargain – not just about price but also on issues of quality and quantity.
2. Prioritize objectives to be aware what you can give up without giving away what you really want. You could prioritize them as first, second, third, etc.; or you could assign each a numeric value to capture more fully the degree of prioritization. In my case, I would have given price a value of “10,” quality a value of “5” and quantity a value of “3.” Considering quantity was of least value, I could have bargained for a better price on the Kennedy book while offering to buy more books without compromising my values.
3. Identify and prioritize the objectives of your opponent, in this case, the seller. I’d say he’s most interested in quantity (which I’d suppose is a 10 for him), because the more he sells, the more he makes. He’d be interested in price (perhaps a 7 for him) because he wants to sell for profit. And quality probably isn’t all that important for him (a 3), because he’s not doing the reading, although he does want to convince others to read his books. Considering his highest valued priority is my lowest valued, that’s probably a point of negotiation, and one that probably would have worked successfully. I say “probably” because when you get into a negotiation, you have to reassess your opponent’s values based on what they’re saying and doing. Your initial evaluation of your opponent may not have been correct.
Of course, having clarity in negotiation is just the beginning. In serious, complex negotiations for millions of dollars, even the seating arrangement of negotiators becomes important. So does the timing of refreshments.
But there’s nothing like having clarity of mind to begin with. You won’t just be able to sleep at night after difficult negotiations. You’ll be able to look yourself in the mirror all day long with confidence that this is someone that gets what he wants because he knows what he wants.
Matt Young, Bizcult















October 31st, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Price, quality, quantity and the priorities of the other party are all important considerations. But so are delivery time, payment terms and costs.
It is a given that you should know what you want going into a negotiation, but knowing the other party’s costs puts you in a significantly stronger position. I rarely negotiate price with suppliers in China because I know the costs of labor and raw materials, and my suppliers know I know these things. So instead we negotiate things like payment terms and production turnaround times.
There have been times when a supplier has quoted me one price and I wrote the order for a lower price and offered it to the supplier because I knew it was still a good deal for them. There have also been times when I’ve written an order for a HIGHER price than I was quoted, because I wanted to reward the supplier or secure better payment terms or delivery time.
Negotiating to reach an equitable solution for both parties is one thing. Haggling for the sake of getting the other party to make a concession can be counter-productive. Rest assured that if you “negotiate” for a cheaper price without knowing the other party’s costs, you might pay a higher price later when the supplier, in an effort to make up the difference, uses an inferior grade of material or bumps your job off the line because a more profitable piece of business came in.
November 4th, 2008 at 8:34 am
Matt is implying that a good negotiator will be able to get the Seller to bring the price down to his own Target Price, but there are so many variables not mentioned in this article making it too simplifistic.
What if this Seller has got the only copies in the area ?, what if he actually intentionally ballooned his price so that he can have a greater margin on which to work out ?, what …?
When I read the article I get the uneasy impression it is all theoretical, taken out of a book written by a pundit.