如何与中国供应商适当地谈判购买契约？ 第3部分
由史蒂文· Chow
(6)争执解决
a. 诉讼或仲裁
问题为争执解决是诉讼或仲裁。 当我从法学院毕业了并且参加了一家大进口&出口公司，我由总经理请求回顾他们的销售合约。 我在合同注意的第一件事是争执解决条目认为两个党可能选择诉讼和仲裁作为解决争端方法。
根据文章中华人民共和国的仲裁法律5，而有关的党达成了一项协议为仲裁，人民法院不会接受给法院被带来的衣服由任何一个唯一党介入，除了，万一协议为仲裁是无效的地方。
如此，如果您选择仲裁作为解决争端方法，您不可能提出反之亦然一项诉讼以同一个要求和。 您选择诉讼或者仲裁，但您不可能选择两个。 A big manufacture company with a deep root here in China like my first employer can make such a mistake, I think many of our fellow users(mostly small and medium sized companies that don’t have a connection in China) will probably make the same mistake too.
b. why arbitration?
We suggests our customers choose arbitration instead of lawsuit as dispute settlement method based on the following:
Reason No. 1 Lawsuit is lengthy and expensive
According to the Civil Procedure Law of People’s Republic of China, there are two instances(first instance and second instance) for a civil case. Normally an international purchase contract related lawsuit will last more than one year, it is money and time-consuming. While for arbitration, the arbitration award is final, it is easy and fast.
Reason No. 2 Territorial Jurisdiction
According to the Civil Procedure Law of People’s Republic of China, A civil lawsuit brought against a legal person or any other organization shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court of the place where the defendant has his domicile. So the independence of the court of jurisdiction, the logistically inconvenience are the issue we should never neglected.
Steven Chow, Managing Director for the China Inspection Company Chinawhy.net
This is the third and final part of “How to negotiate a purchase contract with Chinese supplier properly?”. Here you can find part 1 and part 2.
