Как обсудить подряд покупкы с китайским поставщиком правильн? Часть 1
Steven Чау-чау
Я был причален част покупателями сорванными китайскими поставщиками. Oftentimes когда я спрошу, что они посылают мной подряд покупкы, котор они подписали с поставщиками, некоторые из их пошлют мной предварительную фактуру (PI), и некоторые скажут, никак я не имею подряд или PI, я держу получение которое I посылая ими деньг или вы хочет для того чтобы увидеть emails and/or немедленный показатель переговора посыльного?
Практически, PI посчитан как подряд, но PI слишком просто защитить ваши права, вам нужно написать вниз following термины и условия на paperwork - подряде. Согласно договорному праву Китайской Республики, подряд будет содержать following клаузулы:
(1) название или имя и domicile партий;
(2) предмет подряда;
(3) количество;
(4) качество;
(5) цена или вознаграждение;
(6) регламент, место и метод представления;
(7) пассив для нарушения контракта; и
(8) методы к улаженный спор.
Following будут концами тантьемы для подписания контракт на продажу с китайским поставщиком (концы будут уступаны заказ клаузул подряда):
(1) название или имя и domicile партий;
Make sure the company name, domicile, contact information mentioned on contract are correct. It will be safe if you use the company name, domicile disclosed on their business license and registration form of foreign trade dealers (对外贸易经营者登记表). Only Chinese name and address are listed on the business license, but both English and Chinese name and address will be listed on the registration form of foreign trade dealers.
(2) contract object, quantity and quality clauses
This clause is the definition of what you bought from the suppliers. A certain quantity of product with the quality specification as blah blah. My advices are: a) use full product description so the supplier won’t be confused and could not make any excuses in case of wrong delivery; b) It is important to add a Quality Clause, use the detailed specification to define the product clearly. I was surprised many fellow companies only put a brief products description and no quality clause or standard on the contract, especially those who use PI as a contract.
Steven Chow, Managing Director for the China Inspection Company Chinawhy.net
This is the first part of “How to negotiate a purchase contract with Chinese supplier properly?”, here you can find part 2.
July 16th, 2008 at 2:22 am
Dear Mr. Chow
Thank you for an informative article. It gave me some feedback that is very useful even after 5 years in China.
I do however have one concern and experiences with the legal side of this. Most companies will have a purchase contract most of the time of an amount too small for legal action to be feasible. Or even worse, the supplier is an a rural town in China with poor legal support. The dilemma here is: Do you state in the contract that you should have arbitration in Shanghai, HK or Stockholm? In which case, contracts of less than around US300,000 are too small to go to arbitration for, or do you use the local legal system. If you use the local legal system, then chances are that you will come short as local courts almost always err on the side or local businesses. This gets more likely as the company you are purchasing from is further away from a big city.
As such, in my experience, the best insurance for a bad lot of products has been to keep a good relationship with the factory, spend enough time to clearly, I mean fed spoon by spoon, explain your quality requirements and procedures to check the quality. Then follow up new suppliers closely even during production. I almost lost a contract with a big customer because the factory argued over how to weight a product! Off course this was only their excuse, but it goes to show how trouble can arise out of the blue once you have problems.
Another item that quickly can become a point of argument is the payment term. This is one point I find it pays off to be very detailed. I have learned the hard way that it pays dividend to specify that the payment day is the day you pay the bank, and that when you have issued instructions to your bank for payment, the goods shall be released. If not, and the factory wants to argue, they will insist that the money is in their bank account before they release the goods, and oops, you need to tell your customer you are a week late.
Conclusion, from my experiences, practical follow up is a better insurance than a good contract with many suppliers.