This page is an automated translation
Please see this page for original transcription.

Het concurreren voor Kandidaten in China

6 mei, 2008 door Verhalen de van Bedrijfs China van het Succes

Door Brian Fenerty

rekruut kandidaten in ChinaDe bouw van een talentenpijpleiding is niet gemakkelijk in China en u zult al hulp nodig hebben u kunt krijgen.

Hen die krijgen om u te kennen of over u door een derdetoelage u te kennen een hoger niveau van vertrouwen, geloofwaardigheid en loyaliteit. Volgens Dr. Robert Cialdini in zijn verbazend boek; Invloed: De psychologie van Overtuiging, dit is sociaal bewijs in actie.

Dit is precies waarom de juiste zorg van kandidaten voor uw het aanwerven inspanningen zo belangrijk is. China is momenteel een high-volume type van plaats. Veel van de het aanwerven systemen op zijn plaats hier zijn gebaseerd op de meer--meer filosofie. Als u niet de kandidaten vindt hebt u, krijgt meer nodig! Het probleem met deze benadering is dat het vaak ten koste van kwaliteit wordt uitgevoerd en in een kandidaat de korte markt zoals deze elke kandidaat telt.

De juiste kandidaatzorg zal uw het aanwerven een strategisch voordeel geven en bespaart u geld.

Goed gebaseerd op - de bekende theorie van Kevin Bacon van scheiding weten wij dat wij alle 6 contacten vanaf iedereen zijn wij kunnen wensen om te bereiken. Terwijl ik niet hier deze theorie (die waar moet zijn omdat ik het op interweb) googled moet bewijzen of weerleggen,  Ik moet hier u vertellen dat als u uw niveau van kandidaatzorg verhoogt u onvermijdelijk uw marktreputatie zult verhogen.

Hoe weet ik het?

I know because after every meeting between one of our clients and one of our candidates, and sometimes even someone else’s client, we debrief our candidates on their meetings, who they met, what they discussed, how prepared the interviewers were, the quality of the people they met, how long they waited, who greeted them, what kind of material they were presented with, etc. We have about 15 questions we go through to get an idea of how the meeting went and while we are discussing this we inevitably find out how the candidate was treated. The results are predictable to anyone who has been interviewed in the last few years: if the candidate was deemed hireable s/he was often treated well, if s/he did not make the grade things were not always so pleasant. Since companies usually interview, at least, three times as many people as they hire that is quite a few people walking away with an opinion of the hiring company that decreased upon meeting them.

This is a mistake of very large proportions and it is costing you money. If the candidates you are turning away are not leaving with a smile on their face and a better impression of your company than they had before they met you it will cost you in the long run.

Word of mouth, negative word of mouth, is powerful and I have often spoken with candidates who have formed a bad opinion of a company based on the words of a friend. The point is that the candidate you are looking for, paying me to look for, advertising for, and can’t find, is often the brother/friend/cousin/sister/classmate of the candidate you turned away.

Job candidates can become your spokespeople in the market because they have been exposed to your company in a very intimate way. They have met your managers, toured your office, taken your assessment test. Your unsuccessful candidates, when treated well, can also become a valuable source of referrals.

Free for the asking.

If you are interested to find out how your candidates feel about your interview process all you have to do is ask. It should be a simple matter to implement a simple post-interview survey that can be emailed to unsuccessful candidates (along with your newsletter with other job openings that can be passed to friends) or have the recruiter that prepped them for their interview follow up with them.

Too much trouble?

If this all seems to be too much trouble I would encourage you to look at the time it takes you to fill your jobs, the amount you are paying in recruiting fees, and the way your competition is treating their candidates.

In my opinion, most companies recruiting in China do not take good enough care of their candidates to ensure that they leave with a higher appreciation of the company than when they arrived and I know it is costing them money. This is a candidate driven market and it is imperative to move your recruiting strategy to a model of attraction rather than selection.

Brian Fenerty is the General Manager of AdMark China; he has experience recruiting in candidate-short markets in Asia, North, and South America. Brian can be reached at brian@admarkasia.com. For more insights specific to recruiting techniques in the China talent market please visit his ERE blog - or visit Brian on LinkedIn.

To be notified of new entries by email, simply enter your email address on the top left of this page.

Related Posts

One Response to “Competing for Candidates in China”

  1. Geekette Says:

    Very interesting perspective Brian; one that highlights the difference of firms that adhere to higher levels of professionalism. However, regardless of how well a company treated me when interviewing, if it didn’t hire me, I will have zero inclination to fill out any so-called survey, much less pass on any accompanying newsletter to others. A rejection is still a rejection, no matter how well-coated.

Leave a Reply

WordPress database error: [Table './wordpress_chinasuccessstories/wp_cas_count' is marked as crashed and should be repaired]
INSERT INTO wp_cas_count (id) VALUES (NULL)

WordPress database error: [Duplicate entry '0' for key 1]
INSERT INTO wp_cas_image (id, createtime, word) VALUES (0, 1214003200, 'hugs')

WordPress database error: [Table './wordpress_chinasuccessstories/wp_cas_count' is marked as crashed and should be repaired]
DELETE FROM wp_cas_count WHERE id = 0

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

  • China Business review