Is Sourcing Veilig in China?
Door Rebecca A. Morgan
Sourcing aan China kan rendabel zijn, maar als iets verkeerd gaat, kon het een dramatisch effect op uw bodemlijn hebben - en negatief van de effectklant advies van uw zaken. Kunnen wij op binnenlandse producenten en verdelers om kwaliteit met heftigtheid gelijk aan hun achtervolging van lage lonen te controleren vertrouwen? De goedkope arbeid is het gemakkelijke deel; het kwaliteitsding is een veel taaiere noot om te barsten.Een productrappel is een zeer zichtbaar en duur teken van een ernstig kwaliteitsprobleem. Het levensgevaarlijke potentieel van sommige problemen bracht lang geleden Amerikaanse overheid en producenten ertoe om rappel en omgekeerde distributiesystemen te ontwikkelen.
Grotendeels zijn wij goed bij het berekenen van geworden welk product in gevaar is, waar het ging, en uitvoerend het rappelproces met beperkt kwaad aan het leven. Maar onlangs is het geloof in Amerikaanse op product-gebaseerde ondernemingen geschud door het duidelijke gebrek aan gepaste ijver in het verzekeren de Chinese leveranciers met een laag inkomen aan de zelfde normen zoals ons voldoen.
De recente rappels impliceren Chinese geleverde banden, voedsel voor huisdiereningrediënten, tandpasta, het lood-verf met een laag bedekte speelgoed en de juwelen van kinderen, zeevruchten, vensterzonneblinden, en fietsen. Terwijl vele binnenlandse fabrikanten en verdelers aan China op zoek naar lage kostenbronnen verzonden, blijkt het dat in sommige gevallen de kwaliteitsverzekering een achterbank kan genomen hebben.Kunnen uw zaken effectief met zeeleveranciers werken? De buitenlandse Verkoop van de Band, een klein bedrijf gestationeerd in New Jersey schat zijn rappel van Chinese afkomstige banden over $20MM zal kosten. Volgens de V.S. law the tire importer, not the Chinese company that made the tires, is responsible for the recall.It is important to realize that China is not the U.S. with cheaper labor and less restrictive laws. It is the product of its own history, a history very different from our own. We live in a nation of laws; much of the world does not. We have developed and legislated business ethics, which, by the way, someone in our country violates every day, different from those of other countries. Do not assume that Chinese businesses think or behave the same way yours does.
It would be wrong to conclude that Chinese manufactures cannot match the quality of G8 country producers, that low cost and high quality cannot yet coexist. With Chinese supplier stories front page news in this country, it is easy to overlook recalls issued by North American producers related to themselves or other American suppliers. Those stories suggest we should keep our superiority complex firmly in check while learning to work with offshore suppliers.Ford recently announced recall of 3.6 million cars for faulty speed control devices that could cause fires, bringing their total for that defect over the last 12 years to about 19 million cars. I shouldn’t be surprised; I drove a Pinto while in graduate school in the mid ‘70s.Ford is not unique. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issues monthly vehicle recall reports. The June 2007 report is 11 pages long, including cars, trucks, buses, motorcycles, recreational vehicles and just about anything else that can legally roll along our highways. Vehicles are not unique. In recent weeks aerosol cans and canned foods are among the several products recalled unrelated to Chinese suppliers. In 2007 recalls in our country have ranged from peanut butter to drug infusion pumps. The announced root causes also vary, from manufacturing mistakes and facilities maintenance problems, to deceitful employees — nothing Chinese about any of that.American producers have long touted quality as the price of admission to the domestic marketplace. Competitive advantage would have to come from something more. Despite that knowledge, some companies have made and executed sourcing decisions that undermine assumptions about quality that they want customers to make.The Chinese make a wide array of high quality and high tech products. As with us, they make mistakes, people don’t always do what they are supposed to do, and there’s always someone looking to make a fast buck. There are a lot of start-up businesses with employees new to manufacturing. Caveat emptor is a Latin phrase, not a Chinese one, but it makes sense to consider its meaning when sourcing in a country whose socio-economic-political environment is not well understood.Whether you source domestically or offshore, always perform due diligence. It is naive to assume that every supplier in the world interprets quality standards the same way; that every country, company and person handles disputes the same way; or that quality can be considered a given. It is also naïve to assume that, just because it is in the U.S., a domestic source will meet your quality standards.The savings from low wages can pale in comparison to the costs of a recall. The loss of customer trust can knock a company out completely. Those statements are true regardless of whether you source domestically, in China or anywhere else in the world.
Rebecca A. Morgan, President of Fulcrum ConsultingWorks, Inc. This article was originally published on INC.com. You can find it here




































December 14th, 2007 at 10:19 am
loved every bit of ur story and would appreciate it if u could contact me on this email phill_knight112@yahoo.com..hope to hear from soon.
March 8th, 2008 at 5:09 am
Sourcing from China is SAFE and SOUND if Western companies are not over-greedy for profits. They squeeze every single penny off Chinese plants and compromise quality control, in order for Chinese manufacturers to survive break-neck competition, quality control sometimes have to be ignored. Many large chinese manufacturers are no longer interested in supplying goods to WalMart because they ignore the fact that these Chinese companies deserve decent pay.
We cannot simply blame Chinese for the recalls when western companies are behaving so badly in China.