由坦率的Mulligan

性別混亂現在似乎是天的題目，以援引辨認他們的個性的30%少婦作為部分男性的一個最近報告，部分女性。

這有重要涵義為工作場所，特別是為在態度有認可海域變化的那些人。

根據 勘測舉辦與800名女性一孩子政策學生從大學在上海附近，一次早先勘測， 10年兩倍以上前，看見自己作為部分女性，部分男性在他們的態度。

這些男女不分的態度看上去從當前世代必須審閱的強烈的競爭獲得。

事業&工作
此在事業梯子發起於工作場所或者是至少由競爭得到一隻腳造成的。 競爭從一孩子政策孩子進入幼稚園的天是老練的，但最終目標是一份扎實工作。 學校不可能被批評，因為最巨大的壓力來自父母和他們強烈的需要對於他們的孩子成功。 這成功沒有被測量用父母定義了的方式，沒有孩子。

報告援引他們需要是男性在今天社會的女孩的感覺。 由此他們意味意志堅強，獨立，堅定，有領導能力，冒險並且/或者斷言。 他們的父母享用結束某個時候前的鐵飯碗和他們看見自己如需要獨立地是成功的。 以後 畢業 他們只有他們自己責備。

To my mind, the fact that they are truly alone as only children exacerbates the loss of the Iron Rice Bowl, and the fact that there has been a long standing preference for boys seems to make it even worse. One-child policy kids carry the expectation of six people on their shoulders. This is a heavy burden for any generation, but it seems to be especially difficult for women.

However, the flip side of this is that many managers in China find that female employees can offer more than their male counterparts. The rationale I often hear for this is that women find it harder to succeed generally so they can be more aggressive and business savvy. They have the necessary empathy to ask what needs to be done and how it should be done, as opposed to just taking the work and doing it their way. They have been hardened by the fires of discrimination but it seems from this survey that they have also been toughened up by the system itself.

Many years ago I met and interacted with an older, tougher generation who felt that women and men were truly equal in all respects. Someone told them this was true and they accepted it unquestioningly. Unfortunately, in many cases this meant that they could out-smoke, out-spit and out-swear men, not that they focused on achievement or assertiveness. It wasn’t a pretty sight.

So while the figures in the survey may not bode well, there is a great improvement on what was seen before. The headline issue of the report is designed to catch your attention but it is also worth noting that the current generation of young women still hold to their primary goal; having children and a stable family.

Anyway, androgeny is just a fad. Ask anyone from the 1970’s.

Frank Mulligan, Talent Software