由坦率的Mulligan

性别混乱现在似乎是天的题目，以援引辨认他们的个性的30%少妇作为部分男性的一个最近报告，部分女性。

这有重要涵义为工作场所，特别是为在态度有认可海域变化的那些人。

根据 勘测举办与800名女性一孩子政策学生从大学在上海附近，一次早先勘测， 10年两倍以上前，看见自己作为部分女性，部分男性在他们的态度。

这些男女不分的态度看上去从当前世代必须审阅的强烈的竞争获得。

事业&工作
此在事业梯子发起于工作场所或者是至少由竞争得到一只脚造成的。 竞争从一孩子政策孩子进入幼稚园的天是老练的，但最终目标是一份扎实工作。 学校不可能被批评，因为最巨大的压力来自父母和他们强烈的需要对于他们的孩子成功。 这成功没有被测量用父母定义了的方式，没有孩子。

报告援引他们需要是男性在今天社会的女孩的感觉。 由此他们意味意志坚强，独立，坚定，有领导能力，冒险并且/或者断言。 他们的父母享用结束某个时候前的铁饭碗和他们看见自己如需要独立地是成功的。 以后 毕业 他们只有他们自己责备。

To my mind, the fact that they are truly alone as only children exacerbates the loss of the Iron Rice Bowl, and the fact that there has been a long standing preference for boys seems to make it even worse. One-child policy kids carry the expectation of six people on their shoulders. This is a heavy burden for any generation, but it seems to be especially difficult for women.

However, the flip side of this is that many managers in China find that female employees can offer more than their male counterparts. The rationale I often hear for this is that women find it harder to succeed generally so they can be more aggressive and business savvy. They have the necessary empathy to ask what needs to be done and how it should be done, as opposed to just taking the work and doing it their way. They have been hardened by the fires of discrimination but it seems from this survey that they have also been toughened up by the system itself.

Many years ago I met and interacted with an older, tougher generation who felt that women and men were truly equal in all respects. Someone told them this was true and they accepted it unquestioningly. Unfortunately, in many cases this meant that they could out-smoke, out-spit and out-swear men, not that they focused on achievement or assertiveness. It wasn’t a pretty sight.

So while the figures in the survey may not bode well, there is a great improvement on what was seen before. The headline issue of the report is designed to catch your attention but it is also worth noting that the current generation of young women still hold to their primary goal; having children and a stable family.

Anyway, androgeny is just a fad. Ask anyone from the 1970’s.

Frank Mulligan, Talent Software