由 克里斯托弗聘用

分析，事务-中国故事是高风险的，高返回企业故事。

较长期它可以是大的，但照常，风险保守地说。 这为什么…

7个原因为什么中国故事在创新是危险的：

7. 中国是国家状态的一个大国家，很象欧共体。 没有`中国’国家，在西方人错过的某事。

6. 法律保护也许改善，但法律的观察和执行由省变化省

5. 文化差异被低估，并且没有`中国语言’

4. 缺乏文化自由在中国大陆。 共产主义!

3. 研的贫穷在中国

2. 在立法没观察的知识产权保护

1. 实践上没被观察的知识产权保护。

事务在一致的管理环境和那些地方最好成功与富裕的国内市场。 共产主义想法是坚硬杀害，特别是在国家。

共产主义国家在广泛的创新未成功。

聘用创新圈模型

创新是正面变动。

它是组分可以解释作为启发、实施和市场通入。

启发 在中国是低，研的贫穷，巨型的污染和主要IP偷窃。 如果汉语认可它是重要性，并且根除anti-intellectual共产主义政策，较长期这也许改变。

启发来自是教育和允许探索的知识分子。

共产主义杀害知识分子。 句号。 与知识分子谈话在前共产主义国家，并且证人东欧的拥抱其他系统。

China needs to make it clear intellectuals are welcome, and reduce red-tape for it’s entrepreneurs.

Implementation: Western countries are using China as a factory, and in return China is gaining a knowledge transfer of IP.

I would argue there are some strategic risk of outsourcing food production or strategic goods to China, as is being discovered in the USA at current. Regulation won’t cut it in China. Electronics, plastics and other industries quality ratios are improving.

Market Access: Long-term strong domestic markets derives from innovation. Anyone predicting the decline of USA, Germany, Great Britain or France as large markets is really subject to hyperbole.

Japan had a remarkable success focused solely on technological innovation, but is having trouble adapting to an emerging knowledge-creation economy. It has good chances.

The size of the China market is significant but lack of IP protection means that too much success will be widely copied.

China will most likely overcome these obstacles. But it will be a bumpy ride, and is higher risk than other innovation opportunities. High-risk, high-return people only need apply, with capital and stomach for risk. I don’t think it has been sold to shareholders that way, as executives try to find the China solution.

China Innovators

If I was looking at China, I’d start in Shanghai, and find local business partners for a long-term business relationship. This is pretty much the gist of all advice I have read on the topic from the success stories.

And I would examine China as a regional story, not a ’single nation’. This is how many Chinese think.

But in innovation terms, the risk is higher than alternate opportunities with good innovation opportunities, and stronger climates of inspiration.

The risk is far lower in the similarly homogeneous Eastern Europe, especially pro-business Czechs & Poles. The risk is lower still in a United States/Canada market, although costs are higher, business in a US domestic market from East or West coast hubs is difficult to compete with.

Australia & China Innovation

I would like to point out I am in Australia as I write this, and would state for the record, that Australia is best-placed to work with a successful China as a cultural bridge nation.

It is the Chinese system that is the issue, as we have had a huge number of successful Chinese-born nationals succeeding entrepreneurially regionally in Australia and Hong Kong, both with degrees of freedom.

As a broader nation China needs to protect IP, and show respect for intellectuals. In the long-run I believe they will. In the short-run, my money is on other opportunities inside the US & EU markets.

And for those doing business in China, understand your regions and don’t let cultural assumptions let you assume one billion plus consumers…

Take Care,

Christopher-where’s-my-suitcase?

Christopher Hire
Innovator-In-Chief
2thinknowTM : Global Innovation Agency