によって クリストファーの賃借り

分析、ビジネス-中国の物語は危険度が高い、高戻すビジネス物語を。

より長期的それは大きい場合もあるがいつものように、危険は控えめに述べられている。 ここになぜ…かある

革新の中国の物語が危険なぜであるか7つの理由:

7. 中国はEUと同じように国民国家の大きい国家、である。 `の中国が」国家、欧米人で逃される何かない。

6. 改良する法律の観察そして施行は地域によって地域を変える

5. `の中国の言語無しと同様」、過少見積りされる文化的相違

4. 中国大陸の文化的な自由の欠乏。 共産主義!

3. 中国の多くの粉砕の窮乏

2. 立法で観察されない知的財産の保護

1. 実際に観察されない知的財産の保護。

ビジネスは豊かな国内市場が付いている一貫した規定する環境およびそれらの場所に最もよく成功する。 共産主義の考えは国で、特に殺しにくい。

共産主義の国は広範囲基盤の革新に成功しなかった。

賃借りの革新のループ・モデル

革新は肯定的な変更である。

それはインスピレーシヨン、実施および市場アクセスとして部品説明することができるである。

インスピレーシヨン 中国では低い、粉砕は窮乏主に、大きい汚染および多くのIPの盗難である。 より長期的これは中国語がそれをなら重要性、またanti-intellectual共産主義の方針を根絶するために確認すれば変わるかもしれ。

インスピレーシヨンは教育があり、探検することを割り当てられる知識人から来る。

共産主義は知識人を殺す。 ピリオド。 前共産主義の国の知識人への話、および証人の東ヨーロッパの他のシステムの容認。

中国は明確な知識人によってが歓迎されている、それのための官僚的を減らすことは企業家であるそれを作る必要があり。

実施: Western countries are using China as a factory, and in return China is gaining a knowledge transfer of IP.

I would argue there are some strategic risk of outsourcing food production or strategic goods to China, as is being discovered in the USA at current. Regulation won’t cut it in China. Electronics, plastics and other industries quality ratios are improving.

Market Access: Long-term strong domestic markets derives from innovation. Anyone predicting the decline of USA, Germany, Great Britain or France as large markets is really subject to hyperbole.

Japan had a remarkable success focused solely on technological innovation, but is having trouble adapting to an emerging knowledge-creation economy. It has good chances.

The size of the China market is significant but lack of IP protection means that too much success will be widely copied.

China will most likely overcome these obstacles. But it will be a bumpy ride, and is higher risk than other innovation opportunities. High-risk, high-return people only need apply, with capital and stomach for risk. I don’t think it has been sold to shareholders that way, as executives try to find the China solution.

China Innovators

If I was looking at China, I’d start in Shanghai, and find local business partners for a long-term business relationship. This is pretty much the gist of all advice I have read on the topic from the success stories.

And I would examine China as a regional story, not a ’single nation’. This is how many Chinese think.

But in innovation terms, the risk is higher than alternate opportunities with good innovation opportunities, and stronger climates of inspiration.

The risk is far lower in the similarly homogeneous Eastern Europe, especially pro-business Czechs & Poles. The risk is lower still in a United States/Canada market, although costs are higher, business in a US domestic market from East or West coast hubs is difficult to compete with.

Australia & China Innovation

I would like to point out I am in Australia as I write this, and would state for the record, that Australia is best-placed to work with a successful China as a cultural bridge nation.

It is the Chinese system that is the issue, as we have had a huge number of successful Chinese-born nationals succeeding entrepreneurially regionally in Australia and Hong Kong, both with degrees of freedom.

As a broader nation China needs to protect IP, and show respect for intellectuals. In the long-run I believe they will. In the short-run, my money is on other opportunities inside the US & EU markets.

And for those doing business in China, understand your regions and don’t let cultural assumptions let you assume one billion plus consumers…

Take Care,

Christopher-where’s-my-suitcase?

Christopher Hire
Innovator-In-Chief
2thinknowTM : Global Innovation Agency